Tesco hit with bill after losing £400k Musselburgh schools cost appeal

Tesco has lost a bid to avoid paying interest on a £400,000 overdue payment towards new schools in Musselburgh.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The supermarket giant had repeatedly argued it should not pay the developer fee agreed 13 years ago because it relates to a Musselburgh housing plan it is no longer involved in.

But after an appeal to Scottish Ministers failed to release the company from the education contribution, it asked instead that the due date for payment was moved forward to avoid back dated interest.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Now the Scottish Government Reporter has thrown out their request ruling that the council’s demand for interest to date back to when the money was due in August 2019 was not unreasonable.

Tesco was arguing over the interest on the developer contributionTesco was arguing over the interest on the developer contribution
Tesco was arguing over the interest on the developer contribution

And in his ruling, the Reporter dismissed Tesco’s claim that having handed over the right to build houses on the site to a third party it was no longer part of the original 13-year-old plans for the land at Inveresk.

He told the firm: “Whatever the reasoning at the time for the appellants to agree to make the education contribution, it was made as part of the collective basis on which the consent was considered and granted.

“The appellants secured benefit from that 2008 consent. They built out and currently operate a retail store on part of the planning permission site.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Tesco had argued the plans for the land were not the same as the one it signed up to originally and since it had no control over whether the number of houses the education contribution was based on would ever be built, it should not pay until the work was complete.

However the original agreement called for payment when construction began which was on August 26, 2019.

The chain told the Reporter: “Tesco does not consider that the council or the developer have acted in a fair and reasonable manner throughout this process in consistently making sure that Tesco remains the party due to make the education payment.”

The contested site at Tesco’s former Olivebank store, in the town, was originally given planning permission for housing 15 years ago along with a new supermarket and care home.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Tesco handed over the housing development rights to a third party and went on to build the new store on adjoining land.

Despite this the council said it was still liable for the education contribution, refusing to pass it on to the new housing developer.

East Lothian Council argued Tesco was getting off lightly after the deal over the land at its former store site at Olivebank, Musselburgh, was signed 15 years ago.

It said if a similar deal was struck today the contribution request would be closer to £700,000.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Rejecting Tesco’s call for a delay to the payment due date the Reporter pointed out there was a clause in the agreement that meant if the houses built fell short of the amount they had been charged for East Lothian Council would refund additional money paid.

And he said early payment of developer contributions was important in allowing infrastructure to be built alongside housing.

He said that paying the contribution on completion could mean “the advantages of forward planning may be lost”.

A spokesperson for Tesco said: “We are reviewing the decision.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.