Hibs boss: Referees should be allowed to explain decisions

Neil Lennon believes referees should be allowed to explain controversial decisions '“ but only after a 'cooling off' period.

Saturday, 2nd December 2017, 5:30 am
Updated Wednesday, 6th December 2017, 11:48 am
Neil Lennon

The Hibs manager was speaking at the end of a week in which top whistlers Craig Thomson – who will be in charge of today’s match between Partick Thistle and Hibs at Firhill – and Willie Collum, came under-fire for awarding Celtic hotly-disputed penalties, while he himself lambasted Don Robertson following the Capital club’s match against Hamilton.

However, despite the fall-out from last weekend’s Betfred Cup final and Motherwell again being on the disputed end of a spot-kick call when they met Celtic again in the League in midweek, Lennon claimed the standard of refereeing in Scotland has been “pretty good” in the main.

High-profile incidents, he insisted, will always be highlighted, particularly if the referee is believed to have got it wrong, but Lennon feels in such instances the official should be able to give his side of the story.

Sign up to our Hibs football newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

He said: “I don’t buy into referees coming out after a game and giving answers on decisions straight away with the camera in his face. That’s not right. But maybe if the public or people are looking for clarification the referees’ association could, a couple of days later, put out the ref’s position once his report has gone in and he’s had time to look at it and dissect it.”

Adamant he was seeking to look after the welfare of his players as Roberston showed five Accies players the yellow card in last weekend’s 1-1 draw at Hamilton, Lennon said: “Last week I was talking about the consistency.

“I thought more protection could have been afforded to my players. I made comments about the treatment John McGinn is receiving because I am concerned. Not just tackles, barges in the back, swipes at him.

“Consider the last-minute tackle against Hearts, it was a really bad tackle. There were bad ones on him at Motherwell.

“I voiced my concerns then and we had won, so it’s not sour grapes. I am looking after the welfare of my players, not just John. I thought there was a recklessness about Hamilton’s approach, particularly in the second half, and nothing has changed my mind.

“But in the whole, I think it has been decent. In the main it’s been pretty good from what I have seen. In one or two out of 12 or 13 I have mentioned a referee’s performance. If it is going to be like that for the rest of the season, good.”