Sean Hogg: Crown to appeal against 'unduly lenient' sentence on Dalkeith Country Park rapist who walked free

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
Lord Advocate decides to challenge community sentence on 21-year-old after storm of protest

The Crown is to appeal against the sentence of a man who was spared jail for raping a 13-year-old girl in Dalkeith Country Park on the grounds it was "unduly lenient".

Sean Hogg, 21, was sentenced earlier this month at the High Court in Glasgow to a community payback order of 270 hours of unpaid work after being found guilty of rape. He was also put under supervision and added to the sex offenders register for three years. Hogg, from Hamilton in South Lanarkshire, was 17 at the time of the attack.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The trial judge Lord Lake said that if Hogg had been aged 25 or over he would have been jailed for between four and five years. But he said he did not consider that appropriate, noting he was a first offender with no previous history of prison. The judge added: “Prison does not lead me to believe this will contribute to your rehabilitation."

Sean Hogg was 17 when he raped his 13-year-old victim in Dalkeith Country Park. Picture: Graham Hamilton.Sean Hogg was 17 when he raped his 13-year-old victim in Dalkeith Country Park. Picture: Graham Hamilton.
Sean Hogg was 17 when he raped his 13-year-old victim in Dalkeith Country Park. Picture: Graham Hamilton.

But the sentence sparked outrage and calls to review guidelines which advise that custodial sentences should only be imposed on those under 25 if no other punishment is appropriate. Rape Crisis Scotland said the sentence was “worryingly lenient”. And Harry Potter author JK Rowling claimed: "Young Scottish men are effectively being told 'first time's free'."

Now the Lord Advocate has decided the Crown should appeal against the sentence. Kenny Donnelly, deputy Crown agent at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, said: "Sentence is quite rightly the domain of the independent judiciary. However, the law provides for some limited circumstances in which prosecutors have the right to appeal against sentences.

"The appeal court has set a high test to be satisfied for this to happen. The sentence must be unduly lenient, which means that it must be out with the range of sentences which the sentencing judge, taking account of all relevant factors, could reasonably have imposed. The question of Crown appeal against sentence in this case has been carefully considered and the decision to place this matter before the appeal court has been communicated to the complainer through her representative."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Speaking on behalf of the victim, solicitor Aamer Anwar said on Friday: "This morning we were advised that the Lord Advocate has decided that the Crown should appeal the sentence imposed upon Sean Hogg convicted of rape, on the grounds that it is 'unduly lenient'. My client is relieved and grateful to the Lord Advocate – it has been nearly a month since Sean Hogg walked free from the High Court, ordered to carry out 270 hours of unpaid work after being convicted of rape.

"My client still does not understand why Hogg was allowed to get on with his life when he had ruined her, she wonders how many girls will think there is no point in reporting rape after seeing a rapist walk free. Whilst the police, prosecution and jury did its job, she feels that in the end she was failed by our justice system, but today once more she has some hope that justice will be done."

Scottish Conservative justice spokesman Jamie Greene said: "The Lord Advocate is quite right to appeal this sentence, no doubt driven by the public outcry over the original sentence. The public were incredulous that a child rapist could ever be handed anything other than a custodial prison sentence."

News you can trust since 1873
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice