Edinburgh's Eye Pavilion: The Greens seem to have missed a trick over securing a replacement – Steve Cardownie

The NHS Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion on Chalmers Street (Picture: Greg Macvean)The NHS Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion on Chalmers Street (Picture: Greg Macvean)
The NHS Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion on Chalmers Street (Picture: Greg Macvean)
Quote of the week must surely go to Mark O’Donnell, chief executive of Sight Scotland.

Speaking about the economic reasons for building a new eye hospital in the city rather than disperse services throughout the Lothians, he said of the latter plan: “That’s an additional reason why this could be a short-sighted decision – it’s missing out on an economic opportunity as well as not being the right thing for patients.”

I suspect that this was not an “off the cuff” comment and his use of humour to drive home the point hits the mark.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Opposition to the Scottish government’s move is continuing to gain strength and shows no sign of abating with a number of former patients airing their concerns at a virtual public meeting and which were subsequently reported in yesterday’s paper.

Read More
Edinburgh's Eye Pavilion: Sunderland is to get a new eye hospital, so why not Sc...

Also quoted was Green MSP Alison Johnstone who said of the decision: “It smacks of short-termism and a desperate need to save cash – and perhaps a misguided belief this was a facility which could be picked on and done away with quietly.”

This begs the question of why then did the Greens not dig their heels in and exact a heavier price for their support of the government’s budget?

They could have demanded that the government give a commitment to build a new facility in Edinburgh, rather than accepting the woolly statement that Lothian Health Board would be asked to conduct a review of their eye care facilities.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I am not, of course, party to internal parliamentary budget discussions – but it would appear that a trick has been missed.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

News you can trust since 1873
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice