Rishi’s right to question the value of degrees - John McLellan
He is right to question whether some English students are being “ripped off”, as he put it, by low quality courses with poor employment prospects, but at least the cost burden does not fall on all taxpayers.
Analysing the quality of courses is not straightforward and employment prospects are a very crude measurement, but in Scotland there should be serious questions about the need to spin out standard undergraduate degree programmes over four years.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe standard is three in most other countries, but there is no suggestion from the Scottish Government that reform is necessary to reduce the cost to taxpayers and students whose entry into full-time employment is delayed.
With most Scots entering higher education from sixth form, thousands are only starting their working lives proper at 22 for no good reason other than tradition.
And while education for education’s sake is a noble ideal, taxpayers should not be expected to fund unnecessarily long courses just because the government and the institutions are either too lazy or too scared to question the value of what they offer.
Some students support the academics currently refusing to mark assignments and exams as part of their pay dispute, but if course lengths were cut the resources might fund improved staff conditions without putting more pressure on the public purse.
But in Scotland, the answer is usually squeeze the taxpayer.
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.