Renée La Racineuse
About as much as I’d want to see a tramline to the top.
No, leave this lovely place alone. We are so lucky to have it, don't tamper with natural beauty.
K Grace Rogerson
No! Make the current paths safer.
Another 10 years projec plus billions. Just Just fix current path. Cheaper, natural.
All that’s needed is some minimal dynamite blasting to remove the rotten rock – be all done and dusted for a few grand.
Great idea for folks to go and view and helps to stop corrosion at same time.
Put up a sign at either end if you must, but get those fences down! Anyone unable to see there are dangers from loose rock and stones on a path like that one needs putting away for their own good anyway! There are numerous paths in the Highlands that are just as 'risky'. Get a life and let the walker be the judge!
Not a chance. Arthur's Seat is magnificent and doesn't need any artificial assistance to remain magnificent.
The area is wonderful as it is. Please don't turn it into a theme park. I used to live not far from Duddingston Loch and have memories going as far back as celebrating the end of the war. When I venture back from Canada it's always on my list of places to visit.
No... next question. Just make the current path safe.
Answer .… no. Now these lot are back in power, why ask, they will still go ahead amd mess things up just like they have done to the city and ruin it.
No, leave it natural, too much tampering with 'everything' nowadays!
No! We don’t need gimmicks! It’s fine just the way it is! What a next, an escalator up the Pentlands?
No, leave the landscape alone!
How to ruin a lovely place.
Leave it in its natural state. There's always someone wanting do destroy the natural beauty of this city.
Definitely no, don’t spoil Arthur’s Seat, there’s enough of Edinburgh being destroyed. Before we know it they’ll be building student flats at the bottom.
No, it would attract too many tourists and spoil all the natural scenery.
About as much as I’d like to see a second parliament building
Robert William Tofts
No, keep it natural.
No, leave as is, I played there as a youngster and it’s changed so much in the past 40 odd years.Just leave it the way it is.
No; an eyesore and absolutely ridiculous idea.
Absolutely no way.
No, just no, and another no to the £2.5m cost
It’s not high enough for a walkway like that. My brain can’t work it out.
Absolutely not! Fixing the path with proper ongoing maintenance surely cannot be more expensive than an eyesore which the clowncil will surely monetise for tourists pleasure only.
Np! Ridiculous suggestion.
I'd sooner go for the wire netting over the rocks than this monster.
I’d like to see the potholes filled in.
Noooooo, would ruin a beautiful place.
Maybe focus on getting the park opened again before anything else - long way round in the car today.
Mmm….wonder what they would charge us to walk along it? No thanks.
Ecological, geological and anthropological vandalism. Absolutely not!