Edinburgh City Council spending on outside consultants rocketed to £14m last year

Edinburgh City Council has revealed it spent more than £14 million on consultants last year.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

During the 2018/19 financial year, the council spent £10,414,499 on external consultants across its capital and revenue budgets, but during 2019/20 that figure skyrocketed to £14,371,427.

Some of the big winners include American multinational firm Aecom, which received £1.8m from the council, Leeds-based project management company Turner & Townsend, which was paid £1.2m, and ‘Big Four’ accountancy firm Ernst & Young, which was paid £1.1m for its services.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Aecom was consulted on several projects, including cycle scheme design projects, road user safety audits, the West Edinburgh Active Travel Network and the Burnshot Bridge demolition.

Edinburgh City Council spent more then £14m on outside consultants last year.Edinburgh City Council spent more then £14m on outside consultants last year.
Edinburgh City Council spent more then £14m on outside consultants last year.

Turner & Townsend also benefited from the council’s cycle and transport projects, as it was paid £308,068 for “professional services to support delivery of cycle projects, the West Edinburgh Transport Assessment and active travel, and local development plan transport action programmes.”

The firm was also paid £984,364 for project management roles in the stage two of the Edinburgh trams project, making up the bulk of the council’s £1.69m spend on consultants for the second phase of the trams project.

According to the report, which was presented to the council’s finance committee on Thursday November 5, some of the spend appears to have saved the local authority millions.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Ernst & Young were paid £1.1m for their role in the council’s ‘Commercial Excellence’ programme, which “has delivered approximately £190m of savings, including cost avoidance savings.”

The firm also provided “professional services provided to support delivery of cumulative transformation programme savings of £70m by 2018/19 to meet council-approved savings targets.”

Speaking ahead of the meeting, Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart councillor Andrew Johnston, Conservatives, said: “Each year the council is forced to make huge cuts and the job will get all the more difficult if the spend on consultancy keeps going up and up, as this report sets out.

“What's all the more troubling is that a high degree of these costs relate to projects that didn't have to happen, especially in this financial climate, such as the tram extension.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Value for money has to be at the heart of everything the council does and some of the fees in this report bring that into question.”

At the meeting, fellow Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart councillor Gavin Corbett, Green Party, said: “We’ll all be familiar with the dilemma we have, in that on the one hand we have expert consultants who are very specialised, and on the other hand there’s a caricature of a consultant who borrows your watch to tell you the time.

“I’m looking for an indicator of where the added value is.

“I want to understand where we’re employing external consultants because they have specialised expertise it wouldn’t be cost effective for the council to have within existing staff, and where we’re employing consultants simply because we’ve hollowed out the service so much that we just lack capacity, and it might be more efficient to have the capacity in house.”

Council officers agreed to take on board councillor Corbett’s comments, but said in general consultants are hired when they have specialist skills that the council does not have, such as technical knowledge of tram networks.

Joseph Anderson, Local Democracy Reporting Service

A message from the Editor:Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by Coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.