‘Accidentally buried’ report casts doubt over Tynecastle student homes claims

A council report which was “accidentally buried” has cast doubt over a developer’s claim that a derelict site in Edinburgh is better suited for student flats than social housing.

Edinburgh City Council’s environmental protection team said plans for accommodation for 468 students at the former Tynecastle High site should be rejected when they go before the planning committee later this year.

The recommendation was laid out in a report dated from November last year, but was not available to view alongside the main planning documents online.

It only came to light after being discovered in the community garden element of the development application.

Plans for accommodation for 468 students have been lodged for the former Tynecastle High School

It comes following a long-running campaign opposing more purpose built student housing (PBSA) in Gorgie and Sighthill.

Read More

Read More
Murrayfield Ice Rink: Major step forward as ice set to be laid at city venue

S1 Developments, which is behind the bid, has consistently said that constraints – primarily noise coming from the nearby North British Distillery (NBD) – mean the “requisite level of amenity” can’t be met for residential homes on the McLeod Street site as gardens and balconies would not be provided for everyone living there.

It has argued that building student flats instead “allows us to mitigate the site constraints to a greater degree” by including large outdoor and indoor communal areas.

However, the uncovered council report states there is “no difference between the amenity standards required for residential and student residential developments,” adding the developer is merely “of the opinion” student use will help mitigate the noise issues.

Environmental protection officers have also recommended the application be refused, saying the site is not suitable for any form of residential-led development whilst the distillery is still operational.

A spokesperson for S1 Developments said the report is “not something the applicant has control over.”

They added: “The combined levels of internal and external amenity far exceed any other consented student scheme in Edinburgh, which we hope will become an exemplar for student housing in the city. This communal amenity strategy is not suited to private housing as residents expect a degree of private external space.”

Labour councillor Ross McKenzie said it was “concerning” the report was not included in the main planning application.

He added: “What’s particularly interesting about it is that it advises that the application should be rejected as well as of course stating clearly that there is no difference in required amenity between student and other residential.

“That’s been very central to the argument that the developers have been making.

“The campaign was very much we want this to be social housing not student housing, but the recommendation in the report is that it shouldn’t be housing at all while North British Distillery are present.”

Councillor McKenzie added the various local BPSA developments including the one at Tynecastle High and Westfield could bring around 700 students to the area - a “huge change.”

Ashley Graczyk, former Sighthill/Gorgie councillor and founder of Housing Activism, said: “It is very unfortunate that Edinburgh council officials have accidentally buried this highly critical report.

“It unequivocally states that the amenity standard for student and residential accommodation is the same, rubbishing the developer’s claims.

Aditi Jehangir, chair of Living Rent’s Gorgie/Dalry branch, said: “If this site is not suitable for other residential housing then it is not suitable for student housing. Students deserve the same standards of housing.

Edinburgh City Council was approached for comment.