Union says train safety concerns were raised years before Stonehaven crash

A rail union has said it raised safety concerns about the model of train involved in the Stonehaven derailment that claimed three lives years before the accident took place.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The Aslef train drivers’ union said its concerns about the High Speed Train (HST) rolling stock were not acted on.

On Thursday, a detailed report into the August 2020 crash was released by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB).

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

While the crash was caused by the train hitting gravel which had been washed onto the track, the report found the train involved was designed before modern safety standards were introduced.

The wreckage of the ScotRail "High Speed Train" after it derailed at Carmont. Picture: John DevlinThe wreckage of the ScotRail "High Speed Train" after it derailed at Carmont. Picture: John Devlin
The wreckage of the ScotRail "High Speed Train" after it derailed at Carmont. Picture: John Devlin

It said the outcome would likely have been better if the train had met crashworthiness standards introduced in 1994.

It was reported that Aslef’s general secretary wrote to the Office of Rail and Road’s (ORR) chief inspector Ian Prosser with concerns about the ageing HST fleet.

The letter said: “At least one report produced a number of years ago assumed that the fleet would be replaced by now, and also ­questioned the safety of the driver if involved in a high-speed ­collision.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Aslef therefore wants to see an up-to-date report on the crashworthiness of HST power cars before we agree to their operation past 2020.”

Kevin Lindsay of Aslef said: “There was an opportunity to intervene and we were given the brush-off.

“Chief Inspector Prosser ­basically said the trains meet the standards and, as such, there is no issue to investigate.

“Hindsight is a wonderful science but maybe he should be looking at himself and saying: ‘Maybe we got that wrong.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Just because something met the safety standards when it came in doesn’t necessarily mean it should still be allowed to run 40 years later.”

Following the RAIB report on Thursday, Scotland’s Transport Minister Jenny Gilruth announced a steering group was being set up to examine the safety of older trains on Scotland’s railways, including the HST fleet.

Three people, including the train’s driver and conductor, died in the accident near to Carmont signal box in August 2020.

Responding to Aslef’s comments on the 2018 letter, an ORR spokesman said: “Our thoughts remain with the families of Christopher Stuchbury, Donald Dinnie and Brett McCullough and we welcome the Rail Accident Investigation Branch report and detailed recommendations that need to be addressed with urgency.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“As the safety authority, ORR will be working rapidly with all the parties that the RAIB recommendations are directed at, to review their initial response, and lead in setting out a clear plan for how the recommendations will be addressed and action taken.

“The specific RAIB recommendations on High Speed Trains affect many parties and so we will be bringing all these organisations together as soon as possible to start a review to identify if there are reasonably practicable improvements that can be made regarding High Speed Trains.

“It is a strength of our rail system that safety standards improve over time to ensure our railway remains one of the safest in Europe.

“The arrival of a higher standard does not render earlier designs unacceptable and in 2018 we had no evidence to suggest that the High Speed Train should be subject to any review of its crashworthiness.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Related topics: