Edinburgh Hogmanay funding removal 'kept secret' to avoid 'negative story'

‘Roughly £150,000’ removed from Edinburgh’s annual celebration fund

A removal of funding for Edinburgh’s Hogmanay budget was “kept secret” by the council over fears about a “negative story” on festival cuts, it is claimed.

An email sent by a senior official suggested “roughly £150,000” of the event’s annual £813,000 budget was reallocated to make savings elsewhere in the council last year – but the change was not reflected in the contract put out to tender to avoid “negative press coverage”.

It was hoped the cash could be returned using income usually generated by the Christmas markets and amusements in Princes Street Gardens, according to the internal memo. However, as the festive attractions made no money for the council last winter, a funding gap remains.

Stock photo of the 2022/23 Edinburgh Hogmanay celebrations on Princes Street.

The council has denied the decision to not adjust the amount being offered to companies to run the city’s New Year’s Eve party to £656,000 in line with the revised budget was motivated by concerns about how it would be reported by the media, and said the primary reason was the ‘potential impact on the event’.

Councillor Adam Nols-McVey, SNP group leader, said he was concerned the budget overspend was “kept secret” and feared it could lead to local cultural projects losing funding. Conservative councillor Max Mitchell called it “a concerning example of paying Paul by robbing Peter”.

Councillors were also not told of the decision when they agreed the Hogmanay contract, with a report to the June 2022 Finance and Resources Committee stating: “Edinburgh’s Hogmanay, will be funded from the council’s revenue budget and the maximum budget available per annum is £812,456.”

The local authority faced major problems with the festival last year after contractors Angels Event Experience Limited (AEE) pulled out two months before it was due to kick-off. Emergency operators Unique Assembly stepped in at the last minute but were left with limited time to organise everything, which led to the cancellation of the popular Hogmanay torchlight procession and the world-renowned street party being scaled back.

A report to the Culture and Communities Committee said a projected £400,000 Winter Festivals budget pressure this year was due to the “expected level of Winter Market rental income and the expected cost of the Hogmanay Festival”.

In the email seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), senior culture and events officer David Waddell told councillors the previous Hogmanay operator only took around £656k out of a total £813k budgeted by the council for the celebration, with the “roughly £150k” leftover sum typically spent elsewhere in the Place directorate, such as on keeping museums open for seven days and to fund Scott Monument repair works.

However last year this £150,000 was “removed” as part of a “budget re-alignment exercise” prior to a new operator being secured, and the amount being offered to successful contract bidders was kept at £813,000 “rather than the negative story of a festival having its funding cut,” Mr Waddell’s email read.

“The plan was to use the first £150k from the Christmas income to close this gap and return the [council] budget from £656k to £813k and balance out the pressure. With no income from Christmas last year, the gap remains,” the email added.

Raising the matter at the Culture and Communities Committee earlier this month (October 5) SNP councillor Finlay McFarlane said: “It looks to me like there was £150,000 identified as a saving in Hogmanay that then wasn’t put out to tender as that for fear apparently of a negative press story.”

Executive director of place Paul Lawrence replied: “I don’t think it was about negative press. My understanding is effectively as members know generally there is a budget for Hogmanay but we expect Christmas to be an unsubsidised event.

“Historically I think the amount of money required for Hogmanay had gone down…there was an adjustment made to kind of reflect the actual level, rather than the budgeted level, so there was a mismatch between what went out in the public domain and what was sitting in the budget.

“That was the cause of the problem, we were therefore attempting to try and achieve what had historically been achieved but we were unable to do so. The outcomes we’re trying to achieve for Christmas are not primarily financial, they are social, community, cultural and so on.”

Mr Lawrence added a range of options were being looked at to close the gap but could not say for certain if Christmas market income would return this year.

Cllr Nols-McVey told the LDRS it was clear the council had “blown the winter festivals budget”. Opposition councillors had also been “completely cut out of the decision making process,” he said.

Cllr Nols-McVey added: “It’s concerning that the budget overspend was kept secret but we are now extremely worried that the spiralling costs will mean local community-based cultural projects will lose funding as Labour and their allies try to cover the increase in costs.

“Ultimately it’s the people of Edinburgh who for the second time in a row have to pick up the bill for Labour’s incompetent handling of Edinburgh Christmas.”

Responding to the situation, Cllr Max Mitchell said: “With council budgets already under so much pressure, this is a concerning example of paying Paul by robbing Peter. Despite some creative accounting, the council has ultimately been left with a sizeable financial blackhole to fill.”

The City of Edinburgh Council has been contacted for comment.